Sourcetree discard all mods#

i had a situation where I tried to perform a copy-paste from one page to another, but page 1 in edit mode lost the section and it did not appear in page 2. A user makes unpublished changes and now my workflow on this page is stopped until I contact the person and see whether these should be published etc.Ĥ. One/More users make changes, but I have no way of seeing the actual changes unless I run a doc comparison and yes, then its back to open/close.ģ. Lots of scrolling, closing to see the next comment etc and reopening.Ģ. Now I have to go to open the page in edit mode, where I can no longer see the comments and make changes. Yikes! I enter them on the published page and the responder answers. I want to make several comments on a published page whose answers will change the content of the page. The first button would just use the good old merge strategy - or even just lock the page.Ĭollaborative editing has lots of drawbacks in Confluence:ġ. Wouldn't it be an idea to be able to choose the edit mode? To start with: two buttons: Edit and Edit Collaborative.

Sourcetree discard all mods#

But now, if I open someone else page, I mess up the content deep near the end of it - let's say by mistake - and I merely 'close' the page then this person (and others) may continue to change content later on without even ever having seen what I did !! Besides the words UNPUBLISHED CHANGES (what exactly did change?) the mods aren't even visible in the page history.

Yes, 99 percent is just individual changes. The superior collaborative editing is, the more frustrating it can be for 99 percent of the simple individual content editing. However, Atlassian introduced the collaborative editing as a ubiquitous, mandatory way of editing content. I'm one and all positive about Confluence, no word about that.